Re: writers rant

In your message regarding Re: writers rant dated 08/08/2014, Susan said ...


> On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Sibyl Smirl wrote:

> I am able to overlook a certain amount of bad punctuation; but Not "to stupid
> to live" detectives

Strange things can throw you. Some while ago, I was reading, and enjoying,
a book set in the 7th century in Ireland.

It somewhat threw me when one of the characters referred to some place as
being a number of kilometres away.

Had they said miles, I might not have even noticed. Even if the mile we
know now is relatively modern, the concept of a mile as a unit is
sufficiently old (e.g. the Roman Mile). Had they said leagues, I wouldn't
have blinked, since it sounds old (and again, there is a Roman unit). But,
a kilometre, just sounded too modern and jolted me out of the fictional
world, interrupting my enjoyment.

It would have been so simple to avoid the problem entirely by having the
character say "Oh, it's about a day's walk up the river valley" or "If you
rode hard, you could be there in a couple of hours" or similar. That way,
you avoid all anachronisms. Of course, then you would get some pedantic
bugger saying - no way could somebody of that era have walked that distance
in a day - they didn't have proper shoes, and the path would have been very
slow...


Ian

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Tamson House" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tamson-house+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.