Re: I know I'm asking for it (was Re: A MooTH! A THing!)

On May 10, 2012, at 5:41 AM, Kelley Robbins wrote:

> I agreed with the concepts behind your previous message; it was just the delivery methods that irked me.

Honestly, I almost feel you were too charitable toward my recent posting. While I could argue the merits of any individual post, the preponderance of invective (by simple word count) would be difficult to dispute. While I do believe that abundant swearing, improbable grotesquerie, and a forthright (or, let's be honest, dickish) tone can be good things, it becomes hard to use them to make your points when they're the only thing dripping off your keyboard.

For some reason, people just start to ignore your message and dismiss you as a grotesquely foul mouthed dick after too much of it. Can you believe that?

> Dang. Really didn't mean for it to come across that way. Attention list deadbeats! Consider this official notice - I am not your defender.

Don't you just hate it when that happens? Although "Defender of Deadbeats" has such a nice ring to it.